LJDS • August 11, 2026

How Much Rideshare Assault Data Is Actually Public?

Date

August 11, 2026

Share

Smiling man in a dark suit with a gold tie, seated against a white background.
Smiling man in a dark suit with a gold tie, seated against a white background.

About Attorney

J.D. Smith

Before representing injury victims, J.D. Smith worked in insurance claims and defense. That experience gives him firsthand insight into how insurers evaluate and defend accident claims. Tell us what happened with your rideshare case. We’d like to hear about it.


Contact J.D. Smith

How Much Rideshare Assault Data Is Actually Public? GAO Says the Picture Is Still Incomplete

Rideshare companies publish safety reports, police departments record crimes, and federal agencies collect pieces of the story. Yet a July 2026 Government Accountability Office report concluded that the United States still does not have a complete nationwide picture of assaults involving rideshare and taxi trips.

The data gap is itself one of the most important findings


Congress required recurring federal review of rideshare and taxi safety through Sami’s Law. In its July 2026 report, the U.S. Government Accountability Office examined company data, local police records, federal information and safety practices. Its conclusion was not that assaults cannot be measured at all. It was that the available sources do not combine into a complete national dataset.


That matters because public discussions about rideshare safety often jump from one number to a national conclusion. A company report may cover only certain categories. A police database may not reliably identify whether a ride involved Uber, Lyft or a taxi. A federal crime dataset may not contain the trip-level information needed to isolate ride-hailing incidents.


What the companies had publicly reported


GAO reported that two selected rideshare companies publicly disclosed a combined 52 fatal physical assaults and 4,469 reports in the five most serious sexual-assault categories for 2021 and 2022. Those incidents occurred across billions of rides. GAO also described a much larger number of reports falling into other sexual-assault or sexual-misconduct categories from one company.


The denominator is important, but so is the category definition. A reader cannot responsibly compare two companies by pulling one headline number from each unless the covered years, incident definitions and ride counts line up.


The missing years are a major problem for trend claims


As of June 2026, GAO said selected rideshare companies had not publicly released comparable assault counts for 2023 through 2025. That means a simple question such as “Are rideshare assaults becoming more or less common?” did not have a clean current national answer from public company data.


GAO also reported that three rideshare companies declined its request for nonpublic assault data. That does not prove the unreleased data would show a particular trend. It does mean outside researchers and the public are working with an incomplete record.


Police data add detail without solving the national problem


GAO analyzed local records in Los Angeles and Chicago to understand what police data can contribute. The agency identified hundreds of rideshare- or taxi-related assaults in the Los Angeles data it reviewed and more than one hundred in Chicago during the periods studied. In both datasets, those incidents represented less than one percent of all assaults recorded in the relevant jurisdiction and period.


Local records can help describe where incidents happened and how law enforcement classified them. But local systems use different coding practices, and rideshare involvement may appear in narrative text rather than a standardized field. That makes city-to-city comparisons difficult.


Taxi data are even thinner


GAO’s taxi review illustrates the same limitation. One national taxi company provided verified physical- and sexual-assault counts for 2021 through 2025, but GAO cautioned that the selected companies and available records were not nationally representative. There is no single nationwide taxi dataset that functions as a clean control group for Uber and Lyft.


That is why “taxis are safer” and “rideshare is safer” can both be overconfident statements when presented as national facts. The available evidence can answer narrower questions, but the broad comparison is still constrained by inconsistent reporting.


What a careful safety claim should say


The strongest conclusion from the 2026 federal review is not that rideshare is uniquely dangerous or uniquely safe. It is that serious incidents are measurable, companies have added safety tools, and the public data still have meaningful gaps.


For riders, drivers, lawyers and policymakers, that incomplete picture has practical consequences. It affects how trends are evaluated, how platform claims are compared, and how confidently anyone can say that one transportation mode or company is safer than another.


Sources

White self-driving car on a busy city street with pedestrians and storefronts in the background
By LJDS August 20, 2026
Waymo has placed Seattle in its expansion plans. Here is what that means now, what a future rider can expect from pickup to drop-off, and what to do if a driverless trip does not go as planned.
By LJDS August 12, 2026
People routinely search for a simple answer to whether taxis or rideshare vehicles are safer. The federal data do not support a clean nationwide winner.
By LJDS August 11, 2026
Uber and Lyft both publish safety data, but the reports are not a scoreboard. Different reporting periods, definitions and disclosure practices make for...
Driver silhouette with Seattle, WA in rearview
By LJDS August 8, 2026
Learn how dashcam footage led to the conviction of a rideshare driver. Contact us for legal help with rideshare accident cases.
View from a car interior on a road toward a distant city skyline, with trees lining the sides.
By LJDS August 5, 2026
Learn about Wenjian Zhuo's case where dashcam footage led to his drug conviction. Contact us for legal help with rideshare accidents.
Driver’s hands on the wheel inside a yellow car on a city street
By LJDS July 25, 2026
Understand rideshare accident liability in WA. Get expert help for your claim against Uber or Lyft. Contact us for free case review.
By LJDS July 25, 2026
Robotaxis change the cast of a crash case. When no human rideshare driver is controlling the vehicle, the investigation can shift toward the automated-driving...
Rideshare pick-up zone sign beside a covered curbside area and trees
By LJDS July 24, 2026
Review 10 key rideshare verdicts & settlements highlighting Uber & Lyft liability. Contact us for expert legal assistance!
Gold cat sculpture on a table by a bright window in a cafe or gallery
By LJDS July 24, 2026
Learn what not to say to an insurance adjuster after a Washington Uber or Lyft accident—and what to say instead to protect your claim.